The Supreme Court, in a hearing on Monday (April 25), requested the Union and State Governments to share their views regarding the submission made by the Amicus Curiae, Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, regarding the recognition of physical literacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Additionally, the Apex Court sought the Government’s response on other interim matters.
Mr. Sankaranarayanan, representing the Amicus Curiae, argued that physical literacy, which includes the knowledge and skills needed to perform various physical activities, should be considered a fundamental right. He emphasized that physical education is crucial for overall development and well-being, aligning with the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21.
The Supreme Court’s decision to seek the Government’s opinion on this matter indicates its willingness to consider the recognition of physical literacy as a fundamental right. This move could have significant implications for education policy and the promotion of physical activities across the country.
In addition to the issue of physical literacy, the Apex Court also addressed other interim matters during the hearing. The details of these matters were not provided in the report, but they are likely related to ongoing legal cases or petitions before the Court.
The recognition of physical literacy as a fundamental right could lead to changes in how physical education is prioritized and implemented in schools and communities. It could also encourage the development of policies and programs that promote active lifestyles and address health concerns related to physical inactivity.
The Supreme Court’s decision to seek the Government’s opinion on this matter demonstrates its commitment to upholding the rights and welfare of citizens. It remains to be seen how the Government will respond and what implications this decision will have for the future of physical education and health in India.
