The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News

The Supreme Court has ruled that Section 71 of the Customs Act does not apply if imported goods were stored outside a notified public bonded warehouse with permission.

admin by admin
March 26, 2024
in News
0
The Supreme Court has ruled that Section 71 of the Customs Act does not apply if imported goods were stored outside a notified public bonded warehouse with permission.
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the applicability of Section 71 of the Customs Act, 1962 has significant implications for importers and businesses dealing with imported goods. The court held that Section 71 does not apply in cases where imported goods were stocked outside a notified public bonded warehouse with the permission of the relevant officer.

Section 71 of the Customs Act, 1962 deals with the warehousing of imported goods. It provides that imported goods may be deposited in a public warehouse without payment of duty. However, the section also specifies that the goods must be deposited in a warehouse approved by the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs. Importers must follow the procedures laid down in the Act and rules for depositing goods in a bonded warehouse to avail of the benefits under Section 71.

In the case before the Supreme Court, a portion of the Appellant’s factory premises was notified as a public bonded warehouse. The Appellant sought to stock imported goods outside the notified warehouse area with the permission of the Superintendent of Customs and Central Excise. The question before the court was whether such goods would be subject to the provisions of Section 71.

The court considered the language and intent of Section 71 in its decision. It noted that the section does not expressly prohibit the stocking of goods outside a notified warehouse with permission. The court also observed that the purpose of the provision is to facilitate the warehousing of goods without payment of duty, which can be achieved even if the goods are stored outside the notified warehouse area with permission.

The court further considered the practical implications of a strict interpretation of Section 71. It noted that importers often need to store goods temporarily outside the notified warehouse area due to various reasons, such as lack of space or security concerns. Imposing strict restrictions on such storage could hamper business operations and create unnecessary hurdles for importers.

In light of these considerations, the court held that Section 71 would not apply to cases where imported goods were stocked outside a notified public bonded warehouse with the permission of the concerned officer. The court emphasized that the permission must be obtained before stocking the goods outside the notified area to avoid any violation of the law.

The court’s ruling provides clarity on the interpretation of Section 71 and ensures that importers can stock goods outside notified warehouse areas with the necessary permissions. Importers and businesses dealing with imported goods should be aware of this decision and ensure compliance with the relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 to avoid any legal issues.

Previous Post

The Supreme Court has outlined the factors to consider when determining the term a convict must serve before being eligible for remission in murder cases.

Next Post

The Supreme Court has rejected the appeals filed by the Railways against Indian Oil Corporation regarding the refund of freight charges.

Next Post
The Supreme Court has rejected the appeals filed by the Railways against Indian Oil Corporation regarding the refund of freight charges.

The Supreme Court has rejected the appeals filed by the Railways against Indian Oil Corporation regarding the refund of freight charges.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In