The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Entertainment Law

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted approval for Diljit Dosanjh’s concert to take place in Chandigarh, clearing the way for the event.

admin by admin
December 14, 2024
in Entertainment Law
0
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted approval for Diljit Dosanjh’s concert to take place in Chandigarh, clearing the way for the event.
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On Friday, the Punjab and Haryana High Court gave the green light for Diljit Dosanjh’s concert in Chandigarh’s Sector 34, set for Saturday, but with strict stipulations to adhere to noise pollution regulations and safety protocols. The Court mandated that the noise level at the event’s boundary should not exceed 75 decibels and warned that organizers would face legal consequences if this limit were breached. The Bench, led by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Anil Kshetarpal, emphasized that noise control measures must be strictly followed to prevent disturbance to residents, particularly senior citizens. Justice Nagu remarked, “Citizens deserve a peaceful night,” expressing concern over the event’s potential impact on public peace.
The concert, part of a more extensive series of events in the city, had been challenged in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Ranjeet Singh, who raised several concerns, including traffic disruptions, noise pollution, and the impact on emergency services. Singh pointed out that a recent concert by singer Karan Aujla at the same venue had caused traffic jams and hindered access to medical facilities in nearby sectors. The PIL argued that such events, particularly in high-density areas like Sector 34, compromise the fundamental rights of citizens under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, especially when the authorities fail to implement proper traffic and crowd control measures.
In response to these concerns, the Chandigarh Administration presented a detailed plan to ensure the event would be safely managed. Senior Advocate Amit Jhanji, representing the administration, assured the Court that Sector 34 would be declared a no-vehicle zone for the concert duration. He confirmed that parking would be directed to nearby sectors like Sector 17, with security and traffic management overseen by 2,400 police officers and 600-700 private security personnel. The authorities also promised to deploy 50 gates for entry, a significant improvement over the previous event, where only 500 police personnel were assigned.
The Court also addressed concerns about the noise levels, which had been a point of contention in the PIL. Senior Advocate Akshay Bhan, representing the concert organizers, assured the Court that strict controls would be in place to ensure the sound level did not exceed 120 decibels, as advised by the Chandigarh Commission for Protection of Child Rights (CCPCR). Bhan also emphasized that the concert would conclude before 10 PM, reducing the likelihood of prolonged disturbance.
Despite these assurances, the Court clarified that this event was an exception and expressed concerns about holding concerts in such a congested area. Chief Justice Nagu suggested that such events might be better suited for stadiums or locations outside the city to avoid recurring issues. “These events should be held outside Chandigarh,” he remarked, signalling that future concerts in Sector 34 might face stricter scrutiny.
The PIL also raised concerns about the potential for future disruptions, as another concert by artist AP Dhillon is scheduled for December 21 at the same venue. The Court noted that multiple large-scale events at the exact location within a short span could exacerbate the challenges related to crowd control, noise, and public safety.
The hearing concluded with a directive for a follow-up session on December 18 to review compliance with the noise and safety measures outlined by the Court. The Chandigarh Administration clarified that permissions for future events in Sector 34 would be carefully reconsidered, mainly if issues like traffic, crowd management, and emergency access needed to be adequately addressed. The outcome of this case could influence how future public events are handled in the city, with authorities under increased pressure to ensure that residents’ rights to a peaceful environment are upheld.

Tags: latest post
Previous Post

Delhi High Court rejects PIL demanding a probe into sexual harassment in the film industry. The petition called for an investigation into alleged instances of harassment but was dismissed by the court.

Next Post

The Supreme Court is set to determine whether the failure to provide reasons for an arrest can invalidate it, clarifying the legal position on this issue.

Next Post
The Supreme Court is set to determine whether the failure to provide reasons for an arrest can invalidate it, clarifying the legal position on this issue.

The Supreme Court is set to determine whether the failure to provide reasons for an arrest can invalidate it, clarifying the legal position on this issue.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In