The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Law & Politics

The Delhi High Court has ruled that having only a small portion of the cause of action arising in Delhi is insufficient to establish its jurisdiction in a case.

admin by admin
October 11, 2024
in Law & Politics
0
The Delhi High Court has ruled that having only a small portion of the cause of action arising in Delhi is insufficient to establish its jurisdiction in a case.
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Delhi High Court recently ruled that it cannot claim territorial jurisdiction over a case simply because a small part of the cause of action took place in Delhi [Dr. Neha Chandra vs. Union Of India And Ors].

Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav made this observation while rejecting a petition filed by Dr. Neha Chandra. She had challenged an order by the National Board of Medical Exam Sciences (NBEM), an autonomous body under the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, headquartered in Delhi.

The court noted that aside from the NBEM being located in Delhi, all critical aspects of the case occurred in Uttar Pradesh, outside the jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court. Furthermore, any order passed would primarily affect Uttar Pradesh.

As a result, the court dismissed the petition based on the doctrine of forum conveniens, which states that jurisdiction should rest with the court best suited to resolve the dispute.

“The court has consistently held that the mere fact that a fraction of the cause of action arose within a High Court’s territorial jurisdiction is not sufficient grounds for that court to entertain a writ petition. The doctrine of forum conveniens applies, considering all relevant facts and circumstances,” the court observed.

Dr. Chandra had challenged the NBEM’s cancellation of her diploma course candidature in Uttar Pradesh, allegedly due to a five-month delay in joining classes. She argued that since the NBEM is based in Delhi, the Delhi High Court should have jurisdiction. However, the court disagreed, noting that while it has discretionary powers under Article 226(1) & (2) of the Constitution to hear cases based on a fraction of the cause of action, the exercise of such discretion depends on the specific circumstances of each case.

Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition, giving Dr. Chandra the option to approach the appropriate court in Uttar Pradesh.

Advocates Sriparna Chatterjee and Soumitra Chatterjee represented Dr. Chandra, while Senior Panel Counsel Anushkaa Arora and Government Pleader Gokul Sharma represented the Union of India.

Previous Post

The Delhi High Court has sought a response from the Central Government regarding a petition seeking to outlaw ticket scalping for the upcoming Diljit Dosanjh concert.

Next Post

The Rajasthan High Court has lifted the stay on the release of the movie Jigra. This decision allows the film to be released, following a previous order that had halted its screening.

Next Post
The Delhi High Court has ruled that having only a small portion of the cause of action arising in Delhi is insufficient to establish its jurisdiction in a case.

The Rajasthan High Court has lifted the stay on the release of the movie Jigra. This decision allows the film to be released, following a previous order that had halted its screening.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
Understanding the caste dynamics that shape Andhra Pradesh politics: Exploring the Kamma-Kapu rivalry and the dominance of the Reddys.

Understanding the caste dynamics that shape Andhra Pradesh politics: Exploring the Kamma-Kapu rivalry and the dominance of the Reddys.

May 13, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In