On Tuesday, the Delhi High Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) petition urging the Court to direct the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to compensate the Delhi Police for security arrangements during Indian Premier League (IPL) matches [Haider Ali v Board of Control for Cricket in India].
A Division Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora noted that the responsibility to recover the funds lies with the State, and the Court cannot issue directives in this regard.
The Court highlighted that the IPL contributes significantly to tax revenues and other income for the State.
“IPL brings in substantial tax revenue… The State has the capability to recover the funds. It is their prerogative. We have no authority to interfere in this matter,” the Court stated.
The Bench also underscored the advantages of hosting such sporting events.
“When you look at other countries, you’ll see that State governments actively attract corporations to establish their operations within their jurisdictions. This involves bidding and offering various incentives. Our mindset needs to evolve. Hosting major corporations like IPL boosts revenue,” the Court elaborated.
The Court addressed a plea filed by Haider Ali, who argued that Delhi Police is owed over ₹60 crore for providing security during IPL matches, with Mumbai and Pune Police charging nearly ₹66 lakh per match. However, the Court emphasized that not every issue warrants a PIL and dismissed the petition.
