The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Cyber Law & Technology

Supreme Court Justice KV Viswanathan Cautions Against Believing Messages from “WhatsApp University”

admin by admin
November 23, 2024
in Cyber Law & Technology, Public Interest Litigation
0
Supreme Court Justice KV Viswanathan Cautions Against Believing Messages from “WhatsApp University”
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

During his address on Saturday, Supreme Court Justice KV Viswanathan raised concerns about the growing issue of misinformation spreading through digital platforms like WhatsApp, cautioning the public against falling prey to fake news. Referring to the term “WhatsApp University,” often used to describe the spread of misinformation, he urged people not to be misled by unverified messages.
“Today, misconceptions are widespread. We have this ‘WhatsApp University.’ We should be careful not to get carried away by such messages. There is a lot of truth decay happening,” Justice Viswanathan remarked during the event at OP Jindal Global Law University, where he was part of a panel of Supreme Court judges discussing the Indian Constitution.
In his speech, Justice Viswanathan also addressed the importance of protecting the rights of minorities, clarifying that the term “minority” extends beyond religious groups to include linguistic minorities. “We are all minorities. The term ‘minority’ has often been linked to religion, but it also includes linguistic minorities. It’s crucial to safeguard these rights, and whether we are judges, legislators, or part of the executive, we must defend them with full commitment,” he stated.
Regarding India’s constitutional democracy, Justice Viswanathan emphasized the need for continuous reflection on how the Constitution and its institutions function. He pointed out that, on the whole, India has performed extraordinarily well in upholding constitutional values.
He highlighted the smooth operation of India’s democratic systems, noting that there has been no instance of any Supreme Court judge, state legislature member, or executive clinging to their positions after their terms ended. This, he argued, is a testament to the effectiveness and integrity of India’s constitutional framework. “There has never been a threat of secession, which speaks to the greatness of our people. Our Constitution enshrines equality and diversity and guarantees fundamental rights. We have course-corrected on issues like ADM Jabalpur,” Justice Viswanathan observed.
Justice Viswanathan further praised the Supreme Court’s fundamental structure doctrine, one of the most significant judicial pronouncements in Indian legal history. “The basic structure doctrine has stood the test of time and remains a cornerstone of our legal system,” he said, emphasizing that the judiciary has played a critical role in checking any excesses by the state.
Justice Viswanathan also stressed the judiciary’s responsibility to deliver timely justice, stating that delays undermine the rule of law. “While filing cases demonstrates faith in the judiciary, people expect prompt justice. Failing to provide timely justice violates the rule of law,” he asserted.
In his concluding remarks, Justice Viswanathan underscored the need for the judiciary to maintain its independence, saying that while it must respect all constitutional organs, it must do so “at arm’s length” to ensure it remains impartial and free from undue influence. This balance, he stressed, is vital for upholding the integrity of India’s democratic framework.

Tags: latest post
Previous Post

Karnataka High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Prajwal Revanna in Connection with Fourth Sexual Assault Case

Next Post

Kerala High Court Criticizes Political Parties for Sudden Hartal in Landslide-Affected Wayanad

Next Post
A plea has been filed in the Kerala High Court challenging the penalization of motor vehicle owners and parents for traffic offenses committed by minors.

Kerala High Court Criticizes Political Parties for Sudden Hartal in Landslide-Affected Wayanad

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In