The Supreme Court clarified on Thursday that its directives to provide medical care to fasting farmers’ leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal were solely focused on ensuring his health and safety, and not intended to interfere with his ongoing protest.
Dallewal, a prominent figure in the farmers’ movement advocating for minimum support price (MSP) guarantees, has been on a hunger strike. The Court addressed concerns about media narratives and the Punjab government’s handling of the situation, which might have suggested an ulterior motive to disrupt the protest.
“Our orders are misinterpreted”
A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Sudhanshu Dhulia criticized what was described as a deliberate misrepresentation by some Punjab officials and sections of the media. “Our orders were not meant to pressure him into ending his fast. We directed that his health be safeguarded so that his life is not endangered. He may continue his fast, but his well-being must be ensured,” the Bench stated.
The Court emphasized that Dallewal’s leadership is vital to the farmers’ movement and should not be jeopardized. “He represents a cause, not a political agenda. His life is too precious to be compromised,” the Bench remarked.
Punjab Government’s Response
Punjab Advocate General Gurminder Singh assured the Court that the State was actively engaging with Dallewal and had formed a committee to address his concerns. The AG added that medical aid was being offered in good faith but noted Dallewal’s reservations about accepting it without meaningful progress on the farmers’ demands.
“Our officers are on the ground. The issue is complex because Dallewal insists on certain assurances regarding discussions with the Centre. We need reasonable time to work out a solution,” Singh submitted.
Justice Kant, however, questioned the Punjab government’s communication strategy and commitment. “Have you told him that the committee was set up to address the farmers’ issues? The lack of effective dialogue is concerning,” the Bench noted, urging the State to demonstrate a more proactive approach.
Background of the Case
The Supreme Court had previously directed the Punjab government to persuade Dallewal to seek medical care amid concerns about his deteriorating health. However, during earlier hearings, the State reported that Dallewal refused assistance, fearing it would weaken the farmers’ agitation. Reports also suggested that fellow protestors were guarding against attempts to provide medical aid.
During the December 31 hearing, the State indicated that Dallewal might be open to medical intervention if the Central government engaged in dialogue with the protesting farmers. The Court reiterated that medical assistance should not be perceived as a threat to the movement.
Next Steps
The Supreme Court scheduled the next hearing for January 6, 2025, and instructed the Chief Secretary of Punjab to file a compliance affidavit. “We will assess the progress on Monday,” the Bench said, stressing the urgency of protecting Dallewal’s life while respecting his right to protest.
