The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Banking & Finance Law

Supreme Court Approves Bail for Amandeep Singh Dhall in Delhi Liquor Policy Case; Grants Bail to All Accused

admin by admin
October 25, 2024
in Banking & Finance Law, Public Interest Litigation
0
Supreme Court Approves Bail for Amandeep Singh Dhall in Delhi Liquor Policy Case; Grants Bail to All Accused
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Today, the Supreme Court granted bail to Amandeep Singh Dhall, a businessman and director of Brindco Sales Private Limited, in the alleged Delhi liquor policy “scam” case. This ruling means that all accused in the case—including prominent AAP figures Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, Sanjay Singh, and BRS leader K Kavitha—now have bail.

The bail order was passed by a Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan, who reviewed Dhall’s appeal challenging the Delhi High Court’s June 4, 2024, decision that had denied him bail in the CBI case. Highlighting that the CBI intends to examine around 300 witnesses, the Supreme Court noted that the trial would likely extend for a considerable period. Dhall, having been in custody for over 1.5 years, was therefore eligible for bail as further detention was deemed unnecessary. Senior Advocate Siddharth Dave, representing Dhall, underscored that Dhall was the last of the accused awaiting bail, as all others had received regular or interim release.

Justice Surya Kant, during the hearing, pointed out that the CBI should focus on the quality of its evidence and witness testimonies rather than the sheer number, emphasizing the need for robust convictions in cases involving white-collar crimes. “The focus should be on securing convictions and ensuring accountability rather than simply detaining suspects,” he advised.

### Background Details
The Delhi High Court had initially rejected Dhall’s bail request based on the serious nature of the charges and preliminary evidence. The High Court referred to an FIR alleging that Dhall’s father had provided Rs. 5 crore to a chartered accountant to influence officials in the Directorate of Enforcement related to the ongoing investigation.

In addition to witness testimony and WhatsApp exchanges, documents seized in raids reportedly implicated Dhall in payments totaling Rs. 4.97 crore in additional credit notes. Furthermore, the High Court remarked on Dhall’s connections with influential leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party and his potential role in the conspiracy surrounding the liquor policy scheme. These associations, coupled with the unresolved nature of the evidence and untested testimonies, led the High Court to conclude that Dhall did not satisfy the “triple test” for bail.

On September 17, the Supreme Court issued a notice on Dhall’s appeal against the High Court’s denial of bail. That same day, Dhall and co-accused Amit Arora were granted bail by the Delhi High Court in the related money laundering case stemming from the liquor policy allegations. Before this Supreme Court order, Dhall was the only remaining accused who had not secured bail in the broader liquor policy investigation.

Previous Post

Supreme Court: A court cannot order the transfer of an investigation to the CBI while simultaneously rejecting a bail plea.

Next Post

Denying bail solely because it’s a murder case is unjust: Supreme Court

Next Post
Denying bail solely because it’s a murder case is unjust: Supreme Court

Denying bail solely because it's a murder case is unjust: Supreme Court

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In