The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Kerala High Court Rules Bar Council Cannot Impose Certificate Verification Fees for Enrollment

admin by admin
January 6, 2025
in News
0
Kerala High Court Rules Bar Council Cannot Impose Certificate Verification Fees for Enrollment
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Kerala High Court: Bar Council Cannot Charge Certificate Verification Fees for Enrollment

The Kerala High Court recently ruled that the State Bar Council cannot levy fees for verifying applicants’ educational certificates during the enrollment process (Alan Benny v. Bar Council of Kerala & Anr).

Supreme Court Guidelines Cited

A Division Bench comprising Justice Ziyad Rahman AA and Justice PV Balakrishnan observed that the Supreme Court had already directed universities and examination boards to verify certificates for candidates seeking bar enrollment at no cost.

“Thus, in light of the observations made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, we do not find any entitlement on the part of the first respondent [Bar Council of Kerala] to collect fees for verification,” the Court stated.

The Bench emphasized that the Bar Council must verify candidates’ certificates through the concerned boards and universities without charging additional fees, apart from the enrollment fee.

BCI Fee Directive Overruled

The Court further ruled that the directive of the Bar Council of India (BCI), which mandated State Bar Councils to collect ₹2,500 as certificate verification fees, could not be implemented.

The Bench noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ajay Shankar Srivastava v. Bar Council of India & Anr specifically prohibited Bar Councils from charging verification fees. It also highlighted Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which limits the fees Bar Councils can collect to legally stipulated enrollment fees.

The Case

The petition was filed by Alan Benny, who challenged the Kerala Bar Council’s requirement for verification fees as part of his enrollment process. Benny argued that the fee violated the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Ajay Shankar Srivastava case, which held that Bar Councils could not impose such charges.

The Kerala Bar Council defended the fee, citing a 2017 BCI notice that directed State Bar Councils to collect ₹2,500 for certificate verification to ensure authenticity.

Court’s Observations

The Court reiterated that the Supreme Court had placed the responsibility of certificate verification on Bar Councils, directing them to work with universities and examination boards without imposing additional costs on applicants.

“The above position is clear from the observations made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ext.P3 judgment…wherein it was directed that the State Bar Council cannot charge ‘enrollment fees’ beyond the express legal stipulation under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, 1961,” the Bench noted.

The Court ruled that the BCI’s 2017 directive contradicted Supreme Court orders and was therefore unenforceable.

Enrollment Ordered Without Fees

The Court directed the Kerala Bar Council to process Benny’s application and verify his certificates without imposing any fees. It allowed his enrollment on January 5, 2025, even if the verification remained incomplete, with the condition that his enrollment could be canceled if his certificates were later found invalid.

Representation

The petitioner, Alan Benny, was represented by advocates Aslam KK, Akshai M Sivan, Astel Joseph, Avanthika R, Muhammed Abdul Basith EA, and Roy Antony.

Advocate MU Vijayalakshmi appeared for the Bar Council of Kerala, while Senior Advocate K Jaju Babu represented the Bar Council of India.

This ruling underscores the Court’s commitment to enforcing Supreme Court directives and ensuring fair practices in the enrollment process for aspiring advocates.

Tags: latest post
Previous Post

Kerala Court Grants Interim Bail to Event Organizer Accused in MLA Uma Thomas Accident Case

Next Post

UAPA Tribunal Confirms Five-Year Ban on Sikhs for Justice (SFJ)

Next Post
UAPA Tribunal Confirms Five-Year Ban on Sikhs for Justice (SFJ)

UAPA Tribunal Confirms Five-Year Ban on Sikhs for Justice (SFJ)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In