Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant recently advocated for India and Turkey to emerge as prominent global hubs for alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
During a conference in Ankara on June 1, Justice Kant referenced Turkish folklore to underscore the significance of empathy in resolving disputes. He shared an anecdote involving Nasreedin Hodja, a folk character who diplomatically affirmed the validity of conflicting viewpoints to settle a dispute between a husband and wife.
“This story, though paradoxical, highlights the value of empathy and perspective-taking in conflict resolution. It emphasizes the importance of understanding different perspectives to prevent escalation and promote dialogue,” Justice Kant remarked. He stressed that mediation allows for the resolution of disputes where all parties can be considered right without anyone being wrong.
Justice Kant also highlighted the shared commitments of India and Turkey to enforce foreign arbitral awards and create a favorable commercial environment conducive to cost-effective ADR. He underscored the deep historical and cultural ties between the two nations, spanning from ancient diplomatic relations between Ottoman Sultans and Indian rulers to cultural exchanges in language, cuisine, and philosophical traditions like Sufism.
“India and Turkey, with their strategic geographical locations, efficient legal systems, supportive judiciary, and business-friendly climates, are poised to challenge established norms in the ADR field. They have the potential not only to reshape the global ADR landscape but also to redefine international commercial mediation and arbitration,” Justice Kant asserted.
In conclusion, Justice Surya Kant expressed optimism about India and Turkey’s role in advancing ADR globally, foreseeing a transformative impact in the years ahead.
