The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Family Law

Madras High Court: No Justification for Sustaining Marriage if Spouses Are Abusive and Cruel Towards Each Other

admin by admin
February 28, 2024
in Family Law, News
0
Madras High Court: No Justification for Sustaining Marriage if Spouses Are Abusive and Cruel Towards Each Other
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Madras High Court recently granted a divorce, observing that both the husband and wife were equally abusive and cruel towards each other. They frequently engaged in insulting and vulgar criticism of each other’s family members.

A division bench of Justices G Jayachandran and C Kumarappan, in their ruling to dissolve the marriage, stated that when a couple is involved in a continuous war of words and abusive behavior, there is no merit in preserving the marriage.

“In reviewing the exchange of abusive words (through email and messages) between the parties, this court finds that both the appellant (husband) and the respondent (wife) equally engaged in cruel behavior, which cannot be solely attributed to either party. When both spouses are actively involved in a war of words, abuse, and vulgar criticism of family members, without showing any remorse, it is not justified to maintain their marital relationship,” stated the bench in the order pronounced on February 23.

The bench added that the marital tie, which had become worthless and unproductive, must be dissolved.

Without determining who has inflicted more cruelty than the other, this court allows this appeal, noting that it is not solely the cruelty alleged by the husband, but also the cruelty inflicted by the wife on the husband, that has significantly damaged the marital bond. Consequently, this court is compelled to dissolve this marriage,” ordered the Court.

The Court observed that a family court in Srivilliputhur had dismissed the husband’s divorce plea on grounds of cruelty in October 2022.

The couple got married in November 2017. However, things turned sour and they parted ways. The husband claimed that the wife had harassed him continuously from January 2020 to October 2020 by sending abusive emails and messages. She had also lodged a case of cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code case against the husband and his family members, it was pointed out.

The wife on the other hand alleged that since her husband was working on a ship, he used to return home only after 6 to 9 months and during this time, her in-laws subjected her to mental and physical torture.

While the husband accused the wife of not showing cooperation in physical intimacy, the wife alleged that her husband had a low sperm count and she could only conceive after his treatment.

However, she alleged that her mother-in-law and sister-in-law, pushed her from stairs as a result of which she suffered a miscarriage and thereafter she was not allowed to enter the matrimonial home, compelling her to leave the same and move to her parental house.

Previous Post

Petition Filed in Supreme Court Challenges Demolition Drive in Lucknow’s Akbar Nagar

Next Post

Three decades following his wife’s tragic suicide, the Supreme Court has acquitted a husband in a mere ten-minute session, absolving him of the abetment case.

Next Post
Three decades following his wife’s tragic suicide, the Supreme Court has acquitted a husband in a mere ten-minute session, absolving him of the abetment case.

Three decades following his wife's tragic suicide, the Supreme Court has acquitted a husband in a mere ten-minute session, absolving him of the abetment case.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In