The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Real Estate Law

Delhi High Court criticizes the DDA for the unsafe and substandard construction of Signature View flats, granting permission for their demolition.

admin by admin
December 26, 2024
in Real Estate Law
0
Delhi High Court criticizes the DDA for the unsafe and substandard construction of Signature View flats, granting permission for their demolition.
0
SHARES
4
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a scathing judgment, the Delhi High Court on Monday reprimanded the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for its substandard construction of Signature View Apartments in Mukherjee Nagar, New Delhi, deeming them structurally unsound and unsafe for habitation. The Court authorized the demolition of the apartment complex and directed the DDA to pay interim rent to the residents promptly, ensuring they are provided alternative accommodation until the flats are reconstructed.
Justice Mini Pushkarna sharply criticized the DDA’s handling of the situation, calling its actions grossly negligent and apathetic. She stated that the DDA’s failure to ensure proper construction and maintenance of the apartments put the lives of hundreds of residents at significant risk. The Court emphasized that this negligence violated the residents’ right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. “Such delinquency and gross negligence by the DDA is unpardonable, as it has put the lives of hundreds of residents in great danger,” the Court said, underlining the severity of the situation.
The Signature View Apartments were part of a multi-story housing scheme launched by the DDA in 2010, consisting of 336 flats. However, the buildings started showing significant signs of deterioration just a few years after residents moved in. By 2013-2014, exterior plasters had fallen off, leaving the buildings in a dilapidated state, and by 2012, even the interior ceilings began collapsing. Despite various repair efforts by the DDA over the years, these were superficial and failed to address the deeper structural flaws that rendered the apartments uninhabitable.
After several complaints from residents and multiple inspections, reports indicated that the apartments were beyond repair and would require complete demolition and reconstruction. In December 2023, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) declared the building complex “dangerous,” prompting the DDA to devise a demolition and rehabilitation plan. This plan, finalized in June 2023, was largely accepted by the residents, though some raised objections to the DDA’s stipulation that interim rent would only be paid after all residents had vacated the premises. While 70% of residents had vacated, some remained, and the DDA insisted on full evacuation before paying interim rent.
The Delhi High Court sided with the DDA’s decision to demolish the apartments, recognizing the extensive structural damage. It emphasized that expert reports and multiple inspections had established that the buildings were not salvageable. “Considering the various reports as aforesaid, it is apparent that the buildings in question are structurally unsafe,” the Court stated, adding that it would not interfere in the demolition process since it was based on the findings of expert committees.
The Court also ruled on a contentious issue regarding the DDA’s plan to build 168 additional flats on what had originally been designated as common areas. The flat owners objected to this proposal, arguing that these common areas rightfully belonged to them after the flats were transferred to their ownership. The Court agreed with the residents, holding that the DDA no longer held any rights over these common areas and could not construct extra flats. “While the DDA has the authority to carry out the demolition of the flats in question, it cannot construct extra flats… This Court cannot be oblivious to the needs of the petitioners for living with dignity and with adequate open spaces,” the Court ruled.
Regarding the payment of interim rent, the Court ordered that residents should receive rent payments as soon as they vacate their flats, rejecting the DDA’s argument that payment should be delayed until all residents have vacated. “Considering the precarious condition of the structures, the occupants of the flats cannot be expected to wait till each occupant vacates the flats. It is far-fetched to expect that all the occupants will vacate the flats at one go,” the Court stated. The Court also accepted the DDA’s proposal to pay ₹50,000 per month as interim rent for High Income Group (HIG) residents and ₹38,000 for Middle Income Group (MIG) residents. The Court further ordered that these rent amounts be increased by 10% every year until residents are given possession of their reconstructed flats.
The judgment marks a significant victory for the residents of Signature View Apartments, ensuring their safety, compensation, and the timely reconstruction of their homes. The DDA’s failure to meet its obligations has been firmly addressed, and the Court has put in place measures to safeguard the residents’ interests during the demolition and rebuilding process.
Counsel for the petitioners included Senior Advocate Maninder Acharya, with a team of advocates representing the residents. The DDA was represented by Senior Advocate Deepika V Marwaha, and the Central Government and MCD had their respective legal representatives present during the hearings.

Tags: latest post
Previous Post

Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul has been appointed as a member of the Bahrain International Commercial Court, marking a significant addition to the court’s panel of judges.

Next Post

Bombay High Court rejects gaushala’s plea for custody of cattle seized in illegal transportation case

Next Post
Bombay High Court rejects gaushala’s plea for custody of cattle seized in illegal transportation case

Bombay High Court rejects gaushala's plea for custody of cattle seized in illegal transportation case

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In