The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Law & Politics

The Union Cabinet has given its approval to the “One Nation, One Election” initiative, aimed at synchronizing Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections across the country to reduce electoral costs and streamline governance.

admin by admin
December 13, 2024
in Law & Politics, News
0
The Union Cabinet has given its approval to the “One Nation, One Election” initiative, aimed at synchronizing Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections across the country to reduce electoral costs and streamline governance.
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On Thursday, the Union Cabinet approved the “One Nation, One Election” policy, a landmark decision to hold simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies. The proposal, which the government endorsed, is set to be presented as a comprehensive Bill during the ongoing Winter Session of Parliament.
The idea of simultaneous elections was first put forward by a High-Level Committee led by former President Ram Nath Kovind, which was tasked with examining the feasibility of such a system. In its report, the committee emphasized that holding elections simultaneously would reduce costs and ensure more efficient governance and better focus on national development. The panel argued that it would lead to fewer disruptions in governance due to the frequent election cycles that hinder progress and would also strengthen the democratic fabric by focusing the country’s attention on national issues rather than state-level contests.
The report also identified the constitutional and legal amendments required to implement this policy. It stated that while some amendments would require approval from state legislatures, others could be enacted directly by Parliament. This dual approach would allow for a smoother transition toward simultaneous elections while addressing federalism and regional autonomy concerns.
Following the committee’s recommendations, the Union Cabinet approved the proposal in September, signalling the government’s commitment to moving forward with this reform. The plan received widespread support from four former Chief Justices of India (CJIs)—Dipak Misra, Ranjan Gogoi, Sharad Arvind Bobde, and UU Lalit. The former CJIs participated in consultations, and all supported the idea, recognizing the potential advantages of reducing election-related expenditures and ensuring more focused governance.
Of the 12 former High Court judges consulted on the issue, nine expressed support for implementing simultaneous elections, citing long-term benefits for the nation. However, three judges raised concerns over the practical and constitutional challenges of the proposal. These included former Delhi High Court Chief Justice AP Shah, Calcutta High Court judge Justice Girish Chandra Gupta, and Madras High Court Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee. Their objections centred mainly around the impact on regional representation, the potential erosion of federal structure, and logistical challenges in synchronizing elections across diverse states.
The approval of “One Nation, One Election” marks a historic step toward electoral reform in India. It could fundamentally reshape the country’s electoral landscape, bringing challenges and opportunities for more streamlined governance.

Tags: latest post
Previous Post

Karnataka High Court dismisses FIR against BJP MLA Basangouda Yatnal over remarks about Rahul Gandhi.

Next Post

Delhi High Court rejects PIL demanding a probe into sexual harassment in the film industry. The petition called for an investigation into alleged instances of harassment but was dismissed by the court.

Next Post
Delhi High Court rejects PIL demanding a probe into sexual harassment in the film industry. The petition called for an investigation into alleged instances of harassment but was dismissed by the court.

Delhi High Court rejects PIL demanding a probe into sexual harassment in the film industry. The petition called for an investigation into alleged instances of harassment but was dismissed by the court.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In