The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Legal Ethics

Kerala High Court Criticizes Political Parties for Sudden Hartal in Landslide-Affected Wayanad

admin by admin
November 23, 2024
in Legal Ethics
0
A plea has been filed in the Kerala High Court challenging the penalization of motor vehicle owners and parents for traffic offenses committed by minors.
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On Friday, the Kerala High Court expressed strong disapproval of the flash hartals (strikes) called by the United Democratic Front (UDF) and Left Democratic Front (LDF) in Wayanad on November 19. The political parties organized the strikes to protest the delay in receiving financial assistance from the central government for ongoing rehabilitation efforts in the landslide-hit region.
While addressing the issue, justices AK Jayasankaran Nambiar and Syam Kumar VM criticized the sudden strikes as counterproductive and detrimental to the public interest. The Bench remarked, “It is alarming that both UDF and LDF called for a hartal. This is anti-people. Despite clear court orders against them, Flash hartals like these are unacceptable. The opposition UDF, which previously stated it would not support such actions, participated in the strike. Hartals are meant to address serious injustices, but this serves no real purpose. It does not address the disaster or the larger issue at hand. Calling for a hartal because the Centre is not providing funds is utterly unreasonable.”
The Court also issued a warning, stressing that similar conduct would not be tolerated in the future. “Please inform the government and political parties that such conduct will not be allowed. All parties seem to unite when it comes to actions that harm the people. This conduct is deeply distressing,” Justice Nambiar added.
The case was being heard in connection with the Court’s suo motu proceedings to monitor disaster relief in Wayanad, which has yet to recover from the devastating landslides on July 30. In previous hearings, the Court had raised concerns regarding delays in the disbursement of funds from the Central government to support Kerala’s rehabilitation efforts.
The central government explained that releasing funds from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF) typically requires a post-disaster assessment and inspection, which was still underway in Wayanad. The government also suggested that Kerala utilize the surplus remaining in its State Disaster Relief Fund (SDRF), which includes contributions from the Centre, to provide immediate relief.
Both the State and amicus curiae had opposed this stance, noting that NDRF funds had been released to other states without similar assessments, and thus, Kerala should not be subject to delays.
In response to these concerns, the Central government submitted an affidavit confirming that, after a high-level meeting on November 16, financial assistance of ₹153.467 crore had been approved by the NDRF. This amount will be adjusted against the remaining SDRF funds. Additionally, funds have been approved to airdrop essential supplies and clear debris in Wayanad.
The affidavit also mentioned that Kerala’s Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) had estimated the total reconstruction cost at ₹2,219.03 crore. However, the final report on the assessment was only submitted to the Centre on November 13.
The matter is scheduled for further hearing on December 6. Senior Advocate Ranjith Thampan appeared as amicus curiae, while Advocate Suvin R Menon represented the Central government in the case.

Tags: latest post
Previous Post

Supreme Court Justice KV Viswanathan Cautions Against Believing Messages from “WhatsApp University”

Next Post

Courts should respond promptly to any misuse of Article 356 for imposing President’s Rule in states, ensuring checks on its abuse: Sidharth Luthra.

Next Post
Courts should respond promptly to any misuse of Article 356 for imposing President’s Rule in states, ensuring checks on its abuse: Sidharth Luthra.

Courts should respond promptly to any misuse of Article 356 for imposing President's Rule in states, ensuring checks on its abuse: Sidharth Luthra.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In