The Senate of Jurists
  • Login
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Law & Politics
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Legal Ethics
    • Internship & Career
    • Healthcare Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Education Law
  • Latest Videos
  • ⁠Internship & Career
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Senate of Jurists
No Result
View All Result
Home News Law & Politics

“Unique Case”: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Granting Citizenship to Daughter of OCI Cardholders

admin by admin
May 17, 2024
in Law & Politics
0
“Unique Case”: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Granting Citizenship to Daughter of OCI Cardholders
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Delhi High Court recently directed the Central government to confer citizenship upon a 17-year-old girl who was born and raised in India to parents holding US citizenship at her birth but possessing Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) cards [Rachita Francis Xavier v Union of India & Ors].

Justice Prathiba M Singh issued the order, noting that the petitioner-girl’s situation fell under a unique circumstance not addressed by any specific provision of the Citizenship Act of 1955 or the Passports Act of 1967.

The Court determined that the petitioner, Rachita Francis Xavier, was not an illegal migrant and qualified as a person of Indian origin, making her eligible for citizenship by registration under the category of person of Indian origin as per Section 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act.

“The case falls under Explanation 2, as both parents of the Petitioner were Indian citizens who later obtained US citizenship. Furthermore, the Petitioner was born in India while her parents were lawfully residing in India as OCI card holders,” the Court observed.

It emphasized that Xavier should not be left stateless, deprived of fundamental rights such as freedom of movement, identity, and education, even in a foreign country.

“The denial of citizenship and consequent refusal of a passport could adversely affect the Petitioner and her family. There is no justification for subjecting the Petitioner, a young girl, to unnecessary hardship due to a unique and uncomfortable situation possibly caused by decisions made by her parents/family,” the Court remarked.

Xavier had approached the High Court seeking a passport, stating that she had never held one and was born in India to parents of Indian origin who had acquired US citizenship. Despite her parents being in India at her birth, her passport application was rejected as neither parent held Indian citizenship at the time.

After careful consideration, Justice Singh observed that the petitioner’s case indeed constituted a special circumstance under Section 5 of the Citizenship Act, warranting the Central government to exercise its authority to grant her Indian citizenship.

Accordingly, Justice Singh directed the Central government to utilize the powers conferred under Section 5(4) of the Citizenship Act and confer Indian citizenship upon Xavier.

The Court allowed her to apply for citizenship registration under Section 5 of the Citizenship Act and ordered the government to decide within 30 days in accordance with the Court’s ruling.

Upon obtaining citizenship, the petitioner could then apply for a passport, which should be issued to her within 15 days, the Court stipulated.

Advocates Bharadwaj S Iyengar and Vikas Upadhyay represented the petitioner, while the Union of India was represented by Central Government Standing Counsel (CGSC) Anurag Ahluwalia and advocate Abhigyan Siddhant.

Previous Post

The Supreme Court has mandated the prompt release of land in Bandra for the construction of the new Bombay High Court building.

Next Post

“It’s an honor to lead SCBA after 22 years; we pledge full cooperation with the Bench,” said Kapil Sibal.

Next Post
“It’s an honor to lead SCBA after 22 years; we pledge full cooperation with the Bench,” said Kapil Sibal.

"It's an honor to lead SCBA after 22 years; we pledge full cooperation with the Bench," said Kapil Sibal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • 23.9k Followers
  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

Supreme Court Rules Right to Property Under Article 300A Available to Non-Citizens of India

February 27, 2024
The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to instruct the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release properties that have been attached.

March 5, 2024
The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

The Supreme Court has ruled that eligibility criteria for government jobs cannot be altered midway through the recruitment process.

November 7, 2024
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a teacher’s service cannot be terminated after regularization solely due to a lack of qualification at the time of the initial appointment.

April 1, 2024

Dota 2 and CS:GO top Steam’s 2016 list for most played games

0

Vinales will be as tough for Rossi as Lorenzo – Suzuki MotoGP boss

0

MotoGP makes tyre strategies easier to follow for 2017

0

President Obama Holds his Final Press Conference

0
Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

Recent News

Kerala High Court: Serious sexual assault cases cannot be dismissed even if the survivor wishes to withdraw the case.

Kerala High Court Receives Anticipatory Bail Plea from Rahul Easwar After Actress Threatens Police Complaint

January 13, 2025
The Kerala High Court has declined to dismiss a case against a priest who has been charged with rape after allegedly making false promises of marriage.

False Allegations Under Section 498A to Control Husband Constitutes Marital Cruelty: Bombay HC

January 13, 2025
PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

PIL Alleging RBI Handled ₹30 Crore Defaced by Separatists Dismissed by Supreme Court

January 13, 2025
Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

Kerala High Court: No Plinth Area-Based Fees Allowed for Construction on Reclaimed Paddy Land

January 13, 2025

PAGES

  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Contact us
  • Career
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

NEWS

  • Law & Politics
  • Corporate Law
  • Civil Liberties
  • Cyber Law & Technology
  • International Law
  • Criminal Justice
  • Legal Commentary
  • Environmental Law
  • Healthcare Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Family Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Legal Ethics
  • Real Estate Law
  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Sports Law
  • Education Law
  • Public Interest Litigation

Covering the intersection of legal matters and political events, including legislative changes, government policies, and legal implications of political decisions.

Follow us:

The Senate of Jurists ©2024 – All Rights Reserved.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Legal Ethics
    • Law & Politics
    • Labor & Employment Law
    • Internship & Career
    • International Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Immigration Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Family Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Entertainment Law
    • Education Law
    • Cyber Law & Technology
    • Criminal Justice
    • Corporate Law
    • Contact us
    • Civil Liberties
    • Public Interest Litigation
    • Banking & Finance Law
    • Sports Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • ⁠Latest Video
  • Contact us

© 2024 News Website - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by The Senate of jurists.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In